CED Documentation is for your personal reference and study only
A12
The Deccan Herald, Bangalore, 29 Jun 2008
Religious faultline: Rules differ widely

Pratap Patnaik
The personal laws of different religions subvert womens right to equality guaranteed under the Constitution.

In India, all religious communities have their own personal laws governing marriages, divorce, inheritance, succession, custody and maintenance. They are supposed to govern a woman's rights to equality at home. However, in varying degrees, the personal laws of different religions subvert women's right to equality guaranteed under the Constitution.

Hindus, Sikhs, Jains and Parsis are governed by the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and the Hindu Succession Act,1956. For Muslims laws have been nominally codified in the Shariat Act,1937, the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act,1939 and the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act,1986, whereas Christians are governed under  the Indian Christian Marriage Act, 1872 and the Indian Divorce Act,1969.

Hindus:

Divorce: Recent trend is that many young, highly-educated working couples go for "an agreement for separation" rather than fight it out for years in a court. The legal separation for a Hindu couple, normally, would take about a year, including the six-month mandatory gestation period, allowing for reconciliation, if possible.

Property: Hindu Succession Act gives women an equal right to parental property in the absence of a will; but it also makes provision for a Hindu Undivided Family, where a son gets a share equal to that of his father, while a daughter gets only a share in her father's share. She can't reside in family home unless she's single or divorced and can't claim her share of property as long as the men of the family continue to live in it. A woman's right to agricultural property is also similarly restricted to 'prevent fragmentation of holdings.'

Custody: Courts tend to award child custody to the parent with financial security, adequate parenting skills and least disruption for the child. Mothers get legal custody more often than not, with the father getting visiting rights. Opinion of the child is also elicited by the judge at the time of trial.

Muslims:

Divorce: A Muslim man can use the instrument of 'triple Talak' as the easiest way for divorce. Whereas the law restricts a Muslim woman's right to seek divorce by placing conditions that didn't exist in Islamic Law and are difficult to prove such as cruelty and impotence. She can file for divorce if husband is missing for at least 4 years, failed to provide maintenance for 2 years, sentenced to 7 years imprisonment etc.

Property: Women's right to property has Quranic sanction, but is limited to half of what the male members get. However, the 1937 Act categorically denies women any right to agricultural land.

Custody: Muslim Personal Law makes man the sole guardian of a child. A Muslim woman is only entitled to Mahr or other properties given at the time of divorce. In 1980s, when SC granted alimony in Shahbano case, there was a hue and cry and the govt annulled it.

Christians:

Divorce: Christian couples can divorce through mutual consent, but they have to wait out for two years. However, the Roman catholic church does not accept divorce under Indian Divorce Act. Couples seeking to remain within the church -- wishing to receive Holy Communion or remarry in the church -- have to seek an annulment which can take years.

Property: Woman is entitled to have equal share in her former husband's property.

Custody: Similar to the Hindu rights; decided by courts based on the preference of the child.

http://www.deccanherald.com/Content/Jun292008/panorama2008062875922.asp