The Cabinet’s decision
to clear a package of amendments to the Code of Criminal Procedure
constitutes another important step in the journey towards making the
laws relating to rape more progressive and responsive to the needs of
victims. The proposed amendments are based substantially on the
recommendations in the 172nd report of the Law Commission, which in
2000 carried out a broad review of rape laws. The proposals — which
include provisions for speedy trials; recording the statements of
victims at places of their choice; investigation of cases by women
police officers; and hearing of cases, wherever possible, by women
judges — are aimed at reducing the mental agony of rape victims. They
are a tacit recognition that it is not enough to reform rape laws by
increasing punishments or widening the definition of this awful sexual
crime — an acknowledgment of the importance of supplementing deterrent
measures with those that alleviate the trauma of the sufferers.
A couple of the proposed amendments have their shortcomings. It is not
feasible, for example, to expect women judges, a small minority, to
hear most rape cases, leave alone all of them. But overall, the changes
seek to encourage victims (who might have otherwise not complained) to
file cases; at the same time, it provides a measure of comfort for
those who are willing to risk being stigmatised and report the crime.
Aspects of reporting of rape and its subsequent investigation and trial
are problematical. As the Law Commission in its 84th report noted,
“women are reluctant to report it, partly because of the embarrassment
of discussing the details with male policemen and partly because of the
even more painful humiliation of being a witness in court.” The
country’s rape laws have undergone some reform over the past few
decades. In 1983, changes were made in the Indian Penal Code that,
among other things, altered the definition of consent and increased the
punishment for custodial rape, gang rape and that of pregnant women and
minors. Subsequently, the Indian Evidence Act was amended to make the
presumption that there is an absence of consent in cases where a
complaint is filed and sexual intercourse proved, thereby shifting the
burden of proof on the accused. Amendments in 2005 ushered in further
changes, particularly with respect to the procedure for the physical
examination of victims. The reform of rape laws in this country has
been slow and tardy; if they have come about, it is thanks largely to
the brave campaign waged by women’s groups. While there is still a long
way to go, the proposed amendments are certainly another step in the
right direction.
http://www.hindu.com/2008/05/13/stories/2008051353830800.htm
Copyright © 2008, The Hindu.
