MADURAI: Judicial
officers such as Magistrates and District Judges enjoy immunity of
office and hence they could not be prosecuted for erroneous
convictions/sentences imposed by them, the Madras High Court has ruled.
Dismissing a writ petition filed in the Madurai Bench, Justice K.
Chandru said that the only course available for the aggrieved persons
was to complain to the Chief Justice of the High Court against judicial
officers who had acted injudiciously.
The petitioner had sought for a direction to the Home Secretary to
grant sanction under Section 197(1) (b) of the Criminal Procedure Code
to prosecute two judicial officers and a police Inspector for
sentencing him in a false criminal case.
Remedy
“If the petitioner feels that he was maliciously prosecuted, the remedy
open to him is to sue the persons who are in charge of the
investigation and prosecution and not judicial officers who determine
the case of the petitioner.
“At times, the courts may commit bona fide mistakes. For that very
purpose, there is a hierarchy of courts to correct such errors
committed by the lower judiciary,” the Judge said, pointing out that
even the petitioner had been acquitted by the High Court.
“It is not open to the petitioner to seek, solely on the ground that
his revision has been allowed by the High court and therefore,
necessarily the lower judiciary must face the music for having recorded
a wrong conviction,” Mr. Justice Chandru said.
“False case”
Arguing the case in person, J. Selvaraj of Kanyakumari said that the
police registered a false case against him under Sections 427 (mischief
causing damage to the amount of Rs. 50) and 506 part II (criminal
intimidation) of the Indian Penal Code in 1997.
A Judicial Magistrate convicted and sentenced him to one year simple
imprisonment. On appeal, an Additional District Judge in 1998 confirmed
his conviction but modified the sentence to just four days already
undergone by him. However, the High Court in 1999 acquitted the
petitioner. Aggrieved by the conduct of the judicial officers as well
as the police, the petitioner filed a complaint against them in a Human
Rights Court, which directed him to move the Magistrate concerned. A
Magistrate at Ambasamudram in 2007 dismissed the complaint for want of
government sanction to prosecute the officers.
http://www.hindu.com/2008/09/03/stories/2008090355390500.htm
Copyright © 2008, The Hindu.
