On
a mere suspicion, the army can open fire, arrest and even kill innocent
civilians in north-east. This has let loose a reign of terror, writes
Meihoubam Rakesh from Manipur, narrating tales of horror enacted in
recent years
With the advent of the insurgency
from the late 1960s, the people of Manipur have been facing several
forms of human rights violation at the hands of the security forces
deployed under the assured impunity offered by Armed Forces (Special
Powers) Act, 1958.In April 2006, Union Minister of State for Defence,
MM Pallam Raju, stated that the army had been maintaining a zero
tolerance policy on human rights violations in Manipur. Yet, the armed
forces continue to carry out arbitrary arrests, torture and extra
judicial killings with impunity under the garb of fighting insurgency.
On December 2, 2006, the prime minister of India, during his visit to
Imphal stated that the government was considering amendments to the
Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958 to make it humane. But the
union government has failed to implement the recommendations of the
committee to review the Act under chairmanship of Justice Jeevan Reddy
which recommended repeal of the Act, among other things, through its
final report submitted in June 2005.
In the name of combating insurgency, the security forces occupied many
tourist homes, village schools and even places of worship. The security
forces compelled villagers to work in their camp without paying
anything. Most of the inter-village roads were barricaded for search
operations and frisking of people. They also asked villagers to carry
identity card to be issued by the village authority and those who
defied such instructions were beaten up. In other words, most of the
villagers have been living under constant threat and fear intimidation
by security forces whose ostensible task is to protect them.
There were several instances of the killing of innocent people by the
security forces merely on suspicion of being insurgents. The security
forces never admitted these killings and have instead lodged false FIRs
with the local police, saying that the said individuals were killed in
encounters. At the same time if members of security forces are ambushed
by militants, the forces resort to large scale torture against the
villagers inhabiting the area around the spot of incident.
Human rights organisations have been documenting such incidents for
many years and also filed cases in the Guwahati High Court on behalf of
the victims. In one such case, Pheiroijam Sanajit was picked up from
his house in the wee hours of May 31, 2004 by Indian army personnel and
subsequently killed in a fake encounter. Thereafter the army lodged a
false report with the Sekmai Police Station stating that he was killed
in an encounter. In another case, one Thokchom Doren Singh alias Naba
Singh was apprehended from his wife's house by personnel of Assam
Rifles on June 6, 2004 and killed in a stage-managed encounter. Further
one college boy, Khundrakpam Tejkumar Singh, aged about 22 years was
brutally tortured and killed by the personnel of 19 Assam Rifles
stationed at Yaingangpokpi post after arresting him on March 9, 2004
from his locality. He had no criminal antecedent or nexus with any
unlawful organisation.
Whenever a victim's family approaches the High Court, the security
forces try to persuade them to withdraw the petition by using one
tactic or the other. In some instances, families have succumbed to the
pressure tactics of the security forces.
In one incident of mass torture of innocent villagers by the security
forces just after they were attacked by some unknown militants, a
Public Interest Litigation was filed in the Guwahati High Court. The
incident happened on September 30, 2007 at Umathel Village where at
around 10.30 pm an encounter ensued between PREPAK (a proscribed
organisation) cadres on the one hand and the personnel of 21 Assam
Rifles on the other near a roadside bus shelter in front of the
Kakching Khunou College at Umathel Village, Thoubal District, Manipur.
In the said encounter it is reported that there were casualties on both
sides. At least one personnel was killed while another sustained
injuries on his right hand and ear.
In the aftermath of the incident, additional forces of the Assam Rifles
rushed to the spot and conducted search operations in the area. During
the operation, all the men of Umathel village and its adjoining
villages were called out to the premises of Kakching Khunou College and
they were made to lie on the ground and then beaten up by the Assam
Rifles personnel. Most of victims of Assam Rifle's torture were taken
to the Regional Institute of Medical Sciences (RIMS) Hospital,
Lamphelpat, the Jawaharlal Nehru (JN) Hospital, Porompat and also to
various private hospitals in Imphal.
The villagers reported that they had heard exchange of fire near their
village at around 9.30 pm on Sunday, September 30, 2007. An hour or so
later, the personnel of 21 Assam Rifles, in full combat gear, landed up
at their village and started knocking violently on their doors, asking
all the male members to come out. The Assam Rifles personnel then made
them squat and hold their ears by looping their arms between the legs
and began to thrash them with sticks and rifle butts.
The victims further stated that the Assam Rifles personnel asked them
many irrelevant questions and charged them with harbouring militants in
their village. The Assam Rifles Personnel did not permit the villagers
to even stand up till around 7.30 a.m. It was only when the police
arrived that the villagers were allowed to get up and move to another
place for verification. The villagers were not allowed to return to
their houses. They are now scared to return to their village, fearing
that the Assam Rifles may return and harass them further.
A woman shopkeeper of Umathel Bazar said that the Assam Rifles
personnel ransacked her shop and took away expensive cigarettes and
eatables. But that morning, the AR personnel came again and forced her
family members to repair the damaged shop. No one was allowed to go out
from their houses and any person who was seen outside, including auto
rickshaw and bus drivers were beaten up indiscriminately.
In this unjustified torture and ill-treatment of innocent villagers of
Umathel Village, as many as 52 men are reported to have sustained
injuries. About 30 of them, including a seriously injured victim, were
hospitalized at RIMS Hospital. Among the torture victims were a college
lecturer named Bijoy Singh, 42, and a veterinary doctor named Rajendro
Singh. The villagers were detained till around 8 a.m. of the next day,
October 1, 2007. Thereafter they were released. However, they continue
to live in fear of a possible re-visit by the Assam Rifles personnel.
As a result many of them had left their homes to take shelter in the
homes of relatives in neighboring villages. These villagers are not
only terror stricken, but have also been displaced from their homes and
are not in a position to raise their voice against the unjustifiable
excesses of the Assam Rifles in the aftermath of the encounter.
Subsequently, the High Court directed that a fact-finding inquiry be
instituted by the Director General of Police, Manipur or his
subordinate police officer. When the said police officer issued summons
to the torture victims for recording their statements, they did not
turn up due to the fear psychosis created by the security forces. When
media persons from Imphal went to Umathel to find out why victims were
unwilling to give their statements, they discovered that fear of
reprisals by Assam Rifles was the key factor. Talking to media persons
on condition of anonymity, a 30-year old victim who works in a private
school and has a young daughter to look after, said although he wants
to come out and give his statement about the incident, he is
apprehensive of its consequences for his family. 'I never know when the
security personnel will come and knock at my door. So I cannot speak
the truth against the security forces,' he said.
—The writer is a human rights activist and a lawyer based in Imphal
http://www.combatlaw.org/information.php?article_id=1089&issue_id=39
© Combat Law Publications Pvt Ltd