The much-awaited National Policy on
Bio-fuels, unveiled by the government after the Cabinet’s approval, is
good in parts but has a few impractical provisions. While it envisages
the removal of all Central taxes on bio-fuels and according to them
“declared goods” status to ensure a uniform VAT of 4 per cent in all
states, the target of 20 per cent doping of vehicular fuel by 2017
seems patently unrealistic. For, there are serious doubts about the
availability of adequate ethanol to be mixed with petrol as also of
jatropha-based bio-diesel for replacing one-fifth of hydrocarbon
diesel. For ethanol production, the chief raw materials available in
India are the sugar industry’s by-products like molasses or
non-traditional crops like sweet sorghum. These resources together are
insufficient to produce enough ethanol, which will force the government
to shelve its plan for 10 per cent doping of petrol from October. The
scope for increasing its availability is rather limited unless cane
juice is converted directly into alcohol. The pricing of ethanol is
also an issue. With prices of molasses and rectified spirit having
already spurted, the sugar industry is reluctant to sell ethanol to the
oil marketing companies at the government-fixed price of Rs 21.50 a
litre. The other alcohol-based industries, including the potable liquor
manufacturers, who need ethanol of far lower purity, are willing to pay
substantially higher prices for it. Where bio-diesel is concerned,
jatropha or any other such plant, will have to be grown on an estimated
35 million hectares to meet the assessed requirement. Such a move will
make it the second most extensively cultivated crop, next only to rice.
The availability of such a large chunk of land is doubtful unless some
arable land is also used for this purpose, which the country can
ill-afford to do.
Moreover, the policy makers seem to have overlooked the plea made by
global bodies like the United Nations that the human and environmental
repercussions of large-scale bio-energy plantations and the food
security concerns they cause need to be weighed carefully. Indeed, the
land-based agro-fuel route can potentially lead to inflation and food
shortages, as was witnessed some months ago when the high cost of crude
oil had spurred large-scale conversion of coarse cereals, vegetable
oils and sweeteners into bio-energy, resulting in food shortages and
high food inflation in several countries. Indeed, such concerns assume
far greater significance in India because the new policy, even while
pitching for much higher use of bio-fuels, discourages the import of
feedstock for bio-fuel production. This increases the dangers of arable
and forest land being diverted to mono-cropping of bio-energy
plantations that are ecologically suicidal. In India, a sizeable part
of fuel needs of the rural population is met even today from agro-based
fuels, such as fire wood, cow dung, crop residues and other
agro-wastes. Putting further strain on the land for producing
bio-energy may, therefore, not be feasible without impinging on the
farm sector’s ability to cater to other fundamental needs for food,
fibre, fuel and shelter. In any case, the per capita availability of
land has already shrunk to woefully low levels. Nevertheless, the need
for replacing at least a part of hydrocarbon energy with
environmentally safe and renewable energy cannot be ignored. What is
needed, therefore, is to set the goals realistically and achieve them.
http://www.business-standard.com/india/storypage.php?autono=334758
Copyright @ Business Standard.