CED Documentation is for your personal reference and study only
C33
The Deccan Herald, Bangalore, 25 Jul 2008
Rhetoric & reality of solar electricity
N N Sachitanand
Despite its limitations, the global growth rate of solar photo voltaic installations has spurted.

Those who dislike nuclear energy because of its safety problems strongly tout solar energy as a clean and renewable alternate for India. India experiences clear sunny weather for over 250 days a year, with the average daily solar energy incident over the country  being as high as 5.8  kilowatt-hours per square metre, With a land area of roughly 3 million sq km, this translates to a total energy incidence of 6000 trillion units/year (1 unit = 1 kilowatt hour).

As compared to this, the Ministry of Power has fixed the electricity generation target from conventional sources for the year 2008-09 at 0.75 trillion units, which is not even 0.1 per cent of the incident solar energy. Therefore, the potential for the sun to meet  all our energy needs and liberate us from the dependence on limited and polluting fossil fuels is overwhelming. The question is: Can this potential be translated practically and economically into actuality?

A much-explored method of tapping solar energy is the photovoltaic conversion of solar light to electricity. While a number of materials are known to enable this conversion, the most popularly deployed is semiconductor grade silicon. But, manufacturing semiconductor silicon is a very complex, elaborate and energy — an intensive process which employs a number of toxic chemicals. This makes the material very expensive.

On top of this, the conversion efficiency (electrical energy produced as a percentage of incident solar light energy) for this material is in the range of eight to 15 per cent, depending on what type of  silicon is used (amorphous or single crystal or polycrystalline).

The net effect of all this is that solar photovoltaic (SPV) energy systems are expensive in terms of the capital needed. At present, commercially available systems cost around $ 6 to $ 8 per installed peak watt. Compare this with the capital cost of fossil fuelled power plants at $ 1 to $ 2  per installed watt (depending on the technology and fuel) and it becomes apparent why there is no runaway popularity of SPV systems.

The advent of thin film technologies raises the hope of mass production of basic SPV stock, leading to economies of  scale and lower prices.

One  technology  which mimics nature’s method of converting sunlight to energy, has shown considerable promise in eventually producing SPV power at costs comparable to conventional grid electricity. Called Dye Sensitised Solar Cell (DSSC) technology,  this promises to deliver SPV power at a cost of around $1 per peak watt, which is competitive with conventional grid power.

The other severe limitation for SPV systems is the diffuse nature of incident solar energy. Calculating on the basis of roughly 10 sq. m of panels per kilowatt,  a 400 megawatt power plant would occupy 4 sq. kms  of land for its panels. Clearly, SPV is not the answer for large capacity utility scale power plants .

However, the possibility of hundreds of small, stand alone SPV power generating  units interconnected to the grid is being explored. One example in India is Sagar Island in West Bengal’s Sunderbans where 25 SPV power plants with a total capacity of 1 W have been connected to the grid.

Despite its limitations, the global growth rate of SPV installations has spurted in the last few years with the backing of hefty subsidies offered by governments in countries like Germany, Japan, Spain and the US.  According to the Earth Policy Institute, global SPV  production has been almost doubling every year from 2002 and jumped  to 3800 MW in 2007.

Preliminary data indicates that  the world total for  SPV installed capacity stood at 12,400 megawatts by the end of last year.

In India the installation of SPV systems for feeding power into the grid has been meagre so far due to lack of adequate incentives. The government of India has recently announced a new set of initiatives for installing SPV systems, such as paying Rs15 per unit of power fed to the grid, 20 per cent of capital provision for SPV related projects in SEZs, for example.

But all said and done SPV  systems will only form the  fringe of the nation’s power generation capacity, which is expected to rise from 1,45,000 MW now to nearly 4,00,000 MW by 2030.

http://www.deccanherald.com/CONTENT/Jul252008/editpage2008072480731.asp

 Copyright 2007, The Printers (Mysore) Private Ltd.