India opposes EU carbon
equalization scheme; to fight it at WTO
The European Union (eu) is mulling a “controversial” greenhouse gas
reduction plan, through which it will impose a carbon tax on goods
imported from countries with no emission curbs under the Kyoto regime.
The tariff, seen as a threat to international trade, is part of eu’s
“carbon equalization system”. India has opposed the move to impose such
a tax. Ujal Singh Bhatia, India’s ambassador to the World Trade
Organization (wto), has warned the eu of retaliation and litigation
from its trade partners if the eu goes ahead with any trade restrictive
measures.
The eu tariff will come into place unless an international agreement
subjecting all countries to similar climate change mitigations measures
is arrived at. Developing countries that are not required to follow
mandatory emission cuts under Kyoto Protocol are worried that the
tariff will affect their business.
Officials of the Union Ministry of Commerce and Industry said it will
be a major issue at the wto deliberations just after the Doha round of
trade talks in May. “Such taxes if imposed will be a technical barrier.
They need to be studied well,” an official said. He added that industry
representatives and experts will also be consulted on the issue. Other
sources said that if such a tax is imposed, it should be tied up to
transfer of greenhouse gas reducing technologies from developed
countries.
Grab opportunity
The European Commission released a report titled “Europe’s Climate
Change Opportunity” on January 23. The report stressed that European
countries were at a disadvantage compared to countries such as the us,
India and China, with less stringent climate protection laws. According
to the report, energy-intensive industries in Europe would face a
challenge during their transition to a climate-friendly economy.
Besides rising costs of electricity, European companies will need to
buy carbon credits, which the report terms “additional cost”. eu
officials say this would make production of materials in eu more costly
than those made in India for example, and hence not competitive. “It
also carries the risk that production and pollution both shift to
countries with no low-carbon policies,” the report said.
“In the absence of such (a comprehensive international) agreement, the
eu must take action to ensure a level-playing field,” it added, while
proposing a “carbon equalization system to put eu and non- eu producers
on a comparable footing”. The report says a level-playing field would
mean that countries doing business with Europe may have to obtain
emission permits.
Sources say the plan is a result of pressure from industries and trade
unions. When the commission was debating the policy, its directorate of
industry asked for tax compensation, without which, it said, about 50
sectors of its economy would be vulnerable to imports. Two months
later, at the spring summit of eu heads of state at Brussels in March,
officials said if the rest of the world didn’t match Europe’s carbon
tax and control regimes, eu would take “appropriate measures”. The
measures have not been defined yet. The German news agency, dpa, quoted
French President Nicolas Sarkozy as saying that Europe should impose a
carbon tariff on goods imported into Europe. Sources at wto indicated
that there were disagreements within the eu on carbon import taxes and
the proposal was under the scanner. Media reports hinted that the law
is expected by March 2009.
Gearing up
The Indian industry is trying to find methods to prove that the
proposal does not conform to wto regulations. "Principally, we do not
agree with the proposal. It seems a new tariff barrier is being set up
and we are preparing our inputs for the government to fight it out at
the wto," said Seema Arora, head of the Centre of Excellence for
Sustainable Development, Confederation of Indian Industry (cii). cii is
in the process of preparing a report on what the Indian industry has
done voluntarily to tackle climate change. "The eu does not need to tax
us to tackle climate change. We are responsible enough. Though we do
not have mandatory emission cuts, we are taking a lot of steps
voluntarily," Arora added.
However, carbon tax being an issue pertaining to trade and of
environment, Arora stressed on proper co-ordination between the
commerce and the environment ministries. But Miss Gurpyari, additional
economic advisor to the Union Ministry of Environment and Forests,
said, "We have not heard of the proposal."
The us government too is not in favour of such tariff. According to
media reports, the us will stoutly resist calls for any form of trade
protectionism as a response to climate change. However, the country had
tried to introduce carbon taxes earlier. A proposal to this effect was
drafted as part of America's Climate Security Act, 2007. Under the act,
importers of certain greenhouse gas-intensive goods would be required
to follow the same emission limits as American companies. The bill is
being discussed at present.
http://www.downtoearth.org.in/full6.asp?foldername=20080515&filename=news&sec_id=4&sid=11
Copyright © Society for Environmental
Communications