BHOPAL, India — Hundreds of tons of
waste still languish inside a tin-roofed warehouse in a corner of the
old grounds of the Union Carbide pesticide factory here, nearly a
quarter-century after a poison gas leak killed thousands and turned
this ancient city into a notorious symbol of industrial disaster.
The toxic remains have yet to be carted away. No one has examined to
what extent, over more than two decades, they have seeped into the soil
and water, except in desultory checks by a state environmental agency,
which turned up pesticide residues in the neighborhood wells far
exceeding permissible levels.
Nor has anyone bothered to address the concerns of those who have drunk
that water and tended kitchen gardens on this soil and who now present
a wide range of ailments, including cleft palates and mental
retardation, among their children as evidence of a second generation of
Bhopal victims, though it is impossible to say with any certainty what
is the source of the afflictions.
Why it has taken so long to deal with the disaster is an epic tale of
the ineffectiveness and seeming apathy of India’s bureaucracy and of
the government’s failure to make the factory owners do anything about
the mess they left. But the question of who will pay for the cleanup of
the 11-acre site has assumed new urgency in a country that today is
increasingly keen to attract foreign investment.
It was here that on Dec. 3, 1984, a tank inside the factory released 40
tons of methyl isocyanate gas, killing those who inhaled it while they
slept. At the time, it was called the world’s worst industrial
accident. At least 3,000 people were killed immediately. Thousands more
may have died later from the aftereffects, though the exact death toll
remains unclear.
More than 500,000 people were declared to be affected by the gas and
awarded compensation, an average of $550. Some victims say they have
yet to receive any money. Efforts to extradite Warren M. Anderson, the
chief executive of Union Carbide at the time, from the United States
continue, though apparently with little energy behind them.
Advocates for those who live near the site continue to hound the
company and their government. They chain themselves to the prime
minister’s residence one day and dog shareholder meetings on another,
refusing to let Bhopal become the tragedy that India forgot. They
insist that Dow Chemical Company, which bought Union Carbide in 2001,
also bought its liabilities and should pay for the cleanup.
“Had the toxic waste been cleaned up, the contaminated groundwater
would not have happened,” says Mira Shiva, a doctor who heads the
Voluntary Health Association, one of many groups pressing for Dow to
take responsibility for the cleanup. “Dow was the first crime. The
second crime was government negligence.”
Dow, based in Michigan, says it bears no responsibility to clean up a
mess it did not make. “As there was never any ownership, there is no
responsibility and no liability — for the Bhopal tragedy or its
aftermath,” Scot Wheeler, a company spokesman, said in an e-mail
message.
Mr. Wheeler pointed out that the former factory property, along with
the waste it contained, had been turned over to the Madhya Pradesh
State government in June 1998, and that “for whatever reason most of us
do not know or fully understand, the site remains unremediated.”
He went on to say that Dow could not finance remediation efforts, even
if it wanted to, because it could potentially open up the company to
further liabilities.
In a letter to the Indian ambassador to the United States in 2006, the
Dow chairman, Andrew N. Liveris, sought assurance from the government
that it would not be held liable for the mess on the old factory site,
“in your efforts to ensure that we have the appropriate investment
climate.”
The claims have divided the government itself. It is now in the throes
of a debate over who will pay — a debate that might have taken place
behind closed doors were it not for a series of public information
requests by advocates for Bhopal residents that turned up revealing
government correspondence.
It showed that one arm of the government, the Chemicals and
Petrochemicals Ministry, entrusted with the cleanup of the site, has
wanted Dow to put down a $25 million deposit toward the cost of
remediation, while other senior officials warned that forcing Dow’s
hand could endanger future investments in the country.
A senior government official, prohibited from speaking publicly on such
a contentious issue, described the quandary. “Do you want $1 billion in
investment, or do you want this sticky situation to continue?” the
official said, calling it a stalemate.
The government is expected to make a final decision later this year.
Beyond who will pay for the cleanup here, the question is why 425 tons
of hazardous waste — some local advocates allege there is a great deal
more, buried in the factory grounds — remain here 24 years after the
leak?
There are many answers. The company was allowed to dump the land on the
government before it was cleaned up. Lawsuits by advocacy groups are
still winding their way through the courts. And a network of often
lethargic, seemingly apathetic government agencies do not always
coordinate with one another.
The result is a wasteland in the city’s heart. The old factory grounds,
frozen in time, are an overgrown 11-acre forest of corroded tanks and
pipes buzzing with cicadas, where cattle graze and women forage for
twigs to cook their evening meal.
Since the disaster, ill-considered decisions on the part of local
residents have only compounded the problems and heightened their health
risks. Just beyond the factory wall is a blue-black open pit. Once the
repository of chemical sludge from the pesticide plant, it is now a
pond where slum children and dogs dive on hot afternoons. Its banks are
an open toilet. In the rainy season, it overflows through the slum’s
muddy alleys.
The slum rose up shortly after the gas leak. Poor people flocked here,
seeking cheap land, and put up homes right up to the edge of the sludge
pond. Once, the pond was sealed with concrete and plastic. But in the
searing heat, the concrete cover eventually collapsed.
The first tests of groundwater began, inexplicably, 12 years after the
gas leak. The state pollution control board turned up traces of
pesticides, including endosulfan, lindane, trichlorobenzene and DDT.
Soil sediments were not tested. The water was never compared with water
in other city neighborhoods. The pollution board saw no cause for alarm.
Nevertheless, in 2004, complaints from residents led the Supreme Court
to order the state to supply clean drinking water to the people living
around the factory. By then, nearly 20 years had gone by.
“It is a scandal that the hazardous wastes left behind by Union Carbide
unattended for 20 years have now migrated below ground and contaminated
the groundwater below the factory and in its neighborhood,” wrote
Claude Alvares, a monitor for India’s Supreme Court, who visited here
in March 2005.
He tasted the water from one well. “I had to spit out everything,” he
wrote in his report. The water “had an appalling chemical taste.”
Neighborhood women brought out their utensils to show how the water had
corroded them.
As his report went on to point out, the government was long ago made
aware of the likelihood of contamination. A government research center
warned more than 10 years ago that, if left untreated, the toxic
residue on the factory grounds would seep into the soil and water.
Around the same time, under public pressure, state authorities finally
scooped up the toxic waste that had lain in clumps around the factory
grounds, and stored it inside the tin-roofed warehouse. The warehouse
was padlocked only about four years ago.
The waste was supposed to be taken to an incinerator in neighboring
Gujarat, but the government has yet to find a contractor willing to
pack it into small, transportable parcels. There have been delays in
acquiring transport permits, too, with citizens groups raising new
questions about the hazards of transporting the waste.
Ajay Vishoni, the state gas and health minister, said he was confident
that none of the waste was hazardous anymore, nor had anyone proved to
his satisfaction that it had ever caused the contamination of the
groundwater. “There is hype,” he said.
In 2005, a state-financed study called for long-term epidemiological
studies to determine the impact of contaminated drinking water,
concluding that while the levels of toxic contaminants were not very
high, water and soil contamination had caused an increase in
respiratory and gastrointestinal ailments.
In the Shiv Nagar slum about half a mile from the factory, there is a
boy, Akash, who was born with an empty socket for a left eye. Now 6, he
cannot see properly or speak. He is a cheerful child who plays in the
lanes near his house.
His father, Shobha Ram, a maker of sweets who bought land here many
years after the gas leak and built himself a two-room house, said the
boy’s afflictions were caused by the hand-pumped well from where his
family drew water on the edge of the sludge pond for years. He said it
had not occurred to him that the water could be laced with pesticides.
“We knew the gas incident took place,” he said. “We never thought the
contaminated water would come all the way to our house.”
The stories repeat themselves in the nearby slums. In Blue Moon,
Muskan, a 2-year-old girl, cannot walk, speak or understand what is
happening around her. Her father, Anwar, blames the water.
In Arif Nagar, Nawab and Hassan Mian, brothers who are 8 and 12, move
through their house like newly hatched birds, barely able to stand.
They have no control over their muscles. Their mother, Fareeda Bi, is
unsure of exactly what caused their ailment, but she, too, blames the
water.
“There are more children like this in the neighborhood,” she said, “who
cannot walk, who cannot see.”
To compound the tragedy, there is no way to know to what extent the
water is to blame. The government suspended long-term public health
studies many years ago.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/07/world/asia/07bhopal.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1&th&emc=th
Copyright 2008 The New York Times
Company