As India gears up to launch its first GM vegetable by January next year, debate hots up on whether such produce is healthy and desirable. Eklavya Atray clears the soil.

Is genetically modified food the solution to food shortages and their soaring prices? As India inches closer to producing its first genetically modified vegetable, Bt brinjal, probably as early as January next year, debate is raging among experts, and violent protests are fast building up.

The Bt brinjal has the same Cry1Ac gene from Bacillus Thuringiensis as cotton. The gene is supposed to make the plant tolerant to the Shoot and Fruit Borer insect which attacks it throughout its life cycle. India’s yield-loss due to these insects is estimated to be about $221 million (Rs900 crores).

Earlier this year, on January 25, the supreme court issued a notice to the Union government on a public suit, seeking annulment of the government’s order that exempts genetically modified foods and crops from mandatory laboratory tests. The bench made recommendations for appointment of two eminent scientists including PM Bhargava to allay the fear of the petitioner that the government might be playing into the hands of multinationals.

PM Bhargava is country’s leading molecular scientist who founded the Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology and is now a special invitee to the GEAC (genetic engineering approval committee) set up by the ministry of environment and forests as an inter-ministerial body to oversee the contentious issue. The supreme court invited Bhargava to help bring transparency to the process of allowing field trials of GM.

ays Bhargava, “All Bt cotton seeds as well as the data for GM utilisation in India should be withdrawn. We have been trusting Monsanto (a multinational corporation) till now, which is absurd as no verification of its tests have been done so far.” According to him, “The government should set up its own testing facility so that Monsanto knows that we can verify the tests it has conducted.”

MK Sharma, managing director, Mahyco Monsanto disagrees as he states, “The tests have been conducted on animals like chicken, rats, rabbits etc by not only us but many other independent companies and research centers.”

Bhargava, however, is not convinced, and also comments on the GEAC by saying, “I am surprised by the action of the GEAC. How could they allow these GM activities to take place without conducting proper tests first.” A member of the GEAC who does not wish to be named told DNA, “These views are Bhargava’s alone. We have applied our own expertise in the matter.”

Other activists who have played a major role in the GM issue in India echo Bhargava’s views. They point to the ‘Warangal incident’ in which more than 2,000 sheep died after grazing on a Bt cotton field for seven days.

India is not the only country where GM activists are demanding a ban on GM products. Hungary became the first country in eastern Europe to ban GM crops when it illegalised the planting of Monsanto’s MON 810 maize in January 2005. French president Nicolas Sarkozy announced on January 11 that his country would invoke an EU safeguard clause enabling it to suspend the marketing and cultivation on its territory of even a GM crop that has EU-wide authorization. The decision came after France’s ‘Provisional High Authority on GM Organisms’ presented its report. The Scottish government in November 2007 also made an unprecedented intervention in Brussels to try and help ban genetically modified (GM) crops throughout Europe. There has been an effective moratorium on GM crops in the European Union, with none approved for cultivation since 1998. The activists in India have very similar ideas.

“GM brinjal should be banned. The country’s health is at risk which cannot be allowed,” says Kishore Tiwari of the Vidarbha Jan Andolan Samiti. He also adds, “Many parts of Europe have banned GM foods because of severe health and environmental issues.” According to him, all GM activities should be stopped at once.

Kavita Karungati from Coalition for GM Free India is another expert who opposes GM brinjal. According to her, “It poses great damage to our health. Many civil right groups and farmers also oppose Bt brinjal.” She also adds, “Brinjal shortage is not an issue in the country and it should remain like that.”

Monsanto’s Sharma however defends Bt brinjal by saying, “It’s a known fact that most of these experts oppose this new technology. A normal farmer sprays pesticide at least 50 to 80 times in the whole lifecycle of a brinjal crop so you can imagine how much pesticide a normal person who eats brinjal has to swallow. Bt brinjal is a new technology which only harms some pests and not humans by any means.” According to him, “The reality is that the farmers need Bt crops.”

Suman Sahai of the Gene Campaign, which plays an active part in the GM issue, counters Monsanto’s argument. “Bt brinjal should not be launched in the country as the Bt toxin gene produces poison and when it can harm pests, where’s the proof that it won’t be harmful to humans,” she questions, adding, “It should not be produced at the moment as we really don’t have adequate testing material.”

Rajesh Krishnan of Greenpeace echoes the opinion. “GM activities are not at all good for India,” he says, adding, “Farmers end up using a cocktail of pesticides as secondary pests increase. Also, these GM activities only help the companies and not the farmers or the consumers.”

© 2005-2008 Diligent Media Corporation Ltd. All rights reserved.