the verdict is finally out. Modern
agricultural practices, espoused by the industrial farming model, and
genetically modified crops are not good for the planet and its
inhabitants, says the International Assessment of Agricultural
Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development report. What lends
weight to the conclusions of the report is the fact that these are not
driven by greed; they do not stem from one nation’s wish to impose its
will on the community of nations. This report has evolved under the
auspices of the un and out of a global consultative process that
studied both formal agricultural science and technology and traditional
knowledge.
The report is quite scathing of industrial farming and genetically
manipulated crops. It states outright that gm crops will not address
the challenges of climate change, loss of biodiversity, hunger and
poverty. For that the world must engineer a shift towards
multifunctional style of agriculture that recognizes the ecosystem
services and their values. The report voted in favour of small farms
and criticized big agribusiness models like Syngenta and Monsanto. It
is no surprise, therefore, the us, Canada and Australia, patrons of
industrial farming, have rejected this report. For, embracing the
report would mean cutting into the thriving market for transgenic
seeds, pesticides and fertilizers.
Though not yet looking at natural farming as an option, the Indian
government has at least acknowledged soil fatigue, a problem that has
been silently crushing Indian farmers. It worsens each year, requiring
more and more fertilizers for less and less produce. Added to this is
the rising cost of fertilizers. By announcing nutrient based pricing of
fertilizers on June 12 the government has sought to correct the
situation somewhat, but at best it is a case of too little, too late
(see page 9). Solutions to degraded Indian soil will not come from the
market or from big businesses. They are more likely to be found in our
own backyard. At a time when farmers can barely make ends meet, three
marginal agriculturists in the dry Malwa region raked in profits from
wheat they sowed last rabi season. The particular wheat requires very
little irrigation and some biofertilizers, just right for drought-prone
areas. This particular strand of wheat was developed by our scientists,
but was not reached to India’s farmers. If we focus all our attention
on pleasing big businesses, we will lose sight of the painless
solutions available to us. These sustainable solutions require support
and nurturing, big businesses do not.
http://www.downtoearth.org.in/full6.asp?foldername=20080715&filename=led&sec_id=3&sid=1
Copyright
© Society for Environmental Communications