CED Documentation is for your personal reference and study only
H02
The  Hindu, Chennai, 06 Feb 2008
Vicious parochialism

The chauvinistic and inflammatory rant of the Maharashtra Navnirman Sena chief, Raj Thackeray, against North Indians living in Mumbai, targeting in particular the esteemed Bollywood icon, Amitabh Bachchan, has cast a shroud of fear over Mumbai — with violence spilling on to the streets. In a crude and opportunistic attempt to whip up Marathi regional chauvinism, the estranged nephew of Shiv Sena chief Bal Thackeray hit out viciously at Mr. Bachchan at a party meeting, accusing him of being the brand ambassador of Uttar Pradesh rather than of Maharashtra. Raj Thackeray’s rant included a sharp attack on the Union Railway Minister, Lalu Prasad, alleging that Biharis were being favoured in employment in the railways. What was most regrettable about these provocative remarks was the evidence that in his desperation to retain political relevance, the MNS leader was resorting to the worst trick in the book — fanning the flames of Marathi chauvinism at the expense of imagined aliens, mostly hapless migrants from U.P. and Bihar. As MNS goons beat up people, damaged taxis, and vandalized a theatre showing a Bhojpuri film, it became clear that those paying the price were ordinary people.

Fortunately, this descent to the lowest form of political violence is likely to be contained by the narrowness of the political base of the MNS. The Shiv Sena, which has the real muscle on Mumbai’s streets, has pointedly distanced itself from the clumsy attempts of the MNS to imitate its political tactics. In its post-Hindutva incarnation, the Shiv Sena, like its ally, the BJP, is courting a large constituency of North Indians who have made Mumbai their home. Mr. Bal Thackeray, who finds Hindutva a more potent platform, is clearly disinclined to return to the old agenda of fomenting linguistic chauvinism. Further, the spirited resistance of the Samajwadi Party and its general secretary, Amar Singh, who has lodged a criminal complaint against Raj Thackeray, has sent out a signal that such bullying would not be allowed to pass. Hopefully, this unsavoury episode will peter out, but what remains of concern is the threat to the identity of Mumbai. Its cosmopolitan spirit remains the pride of India even as its greatness reflects the hard work, talent, and contributions of millions of people from several States. The second challenge, which must be faced with unvacillating resistance, is the continuing temptation of politicians and parties, particularly those that have failed to make headway in the public arena, to fall back on retrograde campaigns with incendiary themes with the sole purpose of destructive social polarisation. Yet Raj Thackeray is not Bal Thackeray and his clumsy attempts to revive the ‘Mumbai for Mumbaikars’ platform have run aground. To borrow from Marx’s ironic observation, drawing from Hegel, history repeats itself, “the first time as tragedy, the second as farce.”




http://www.hindu.com/2008/02/06/stories/2008020652171000.htm

Copyright © 2008, The Hindu.