CED Documentation is for your personal reference and study only
H40a
The Deccan Herald, Bangalore, 05 Nov 2008
Stem corruption in the NREGP
Manohar N Kulkarni
About Rs 71.5 million has gone in bribes mostly to district and block level bureaucrats.

The National Rural Employment Guarantee Programme (NREGP) launched in 2005 is the largest rural employment programme ever undertaken in India with an investment of Rs 30,000 crore  every year, unleashing wage employment and livelihood opportunities for millions of rural poor in the country. It guarantees the right to work for 100 days in a year for below the poverty line (BPL) families although many poor families have also taken advantage. If not employed the eligible person has to get an unemployment allowance. Each village panchayat issues a job card after  the villager registers his or her name for the willingness to work. After working the villager is supposed to get  the cash amount for the work done every week. Some states have made arrangements to credit the amount in  post offices or banks to minimise misappropriation

The State has to give both men and women equal minimum wages and the Gram Sabha has to select the type of rural work which help the village economy by way of better watershed, rural roads, soil conservation works etc. Wherever women are employed there have to be arrangements for on-site child care facilities and health protection. Under the NREGA 2005, panchayats at all the three levels — village, taluk and districts have been specifically assigned tasks and responsibilities to manage this programme. The funds under NREGP, the functionaries to execute the rural works and the entire works progamme — have all to be under the control of the panchayats.

When the news that thousands of panchayat members gathered in New Delhi (October 14-15 ) on the problems faced by them in managing NREGP, one got the feeling that this flagship programme has faced enormous leadership and management problems right across the country. Thanks to the initiative of the Institute of Social Sciences, New Delhi and the support of the Swedish and Swiss Embassies in India this massive gathering of panchayat members was made possible and the voice of grassroots governance was heard in the political portals of the capital.

The biggest management problem of this NREGP starts with the three Central  Ministries: Ministries of Finance, Panchayati Raj and the Rural Development. If the Panchayats have to manage this programme in 6,00,000 villages of India the first step is to provide funds to the Ministry of Panchayats and not to the Ministry of Rural Development. When the funds flow to the Rural Development  Departments at the state level the funds are either diverted or not passed on to the Panchayats.

The buck stops at the Gram Panchayat level. The panchayat presidents are  confused with the idea of guaranteeing work for the village elderly. There is no training given to the panchayat  members and their functionaries on how to manage this complex programme and under the NREG Act the job card has to be issued by the Village Panchayats. No job card means no work and the proof of work is the muster roll attendance. The wages are paid based only on muster roll and the biggest corruption is found at this stage.  The Centre for Media Studies (CMS) New Delhi and the Transparency International India (TII) Report has revealed that the corruption in NREGP is alarming  in Karnataka, Assam MP and Orissa. High and moderate in Gujarat, Maharsatra Tamil Nadu and others.

According to CMS-TII  Report as much as Rs 71.5 million have been cornered in bribes mostly by the district and block level bureaucrats and the panchayats are held as scape goats by the state level ministers, MLAs and MPs. A panchayat leader from Andhra Pradesh lamented that the NREGP is “outsourced” to the contractors in Andhra Pradesh who spin out good reports on the employment generated  with the help of the State Rural Development Directorates. The late Rajiv Gandhi believed that out of ten rupees that the New Delhi ministry remits to the state and the lower level agencies, only one rupee reaches the final beneficiary. It was in the spirit of devolution of power to the grassroots that the 73rd and 74th Constitutional amendments were brought in to strengthen Village Panchayats and Nagarpalikas.

NREGP is an important function which helps the rural poor, and if it is properly  managed by the Gram Panchayats by getting proper funds under their control  then the rural poor can hope  to get better life.




http://www.deccanherald.com/CONTENT/Nov52008/editpage2008110498841.asp

Copyright 2007, The Printers (Mysore) Private Ltd.