Truong Thi Nha stands just
four-and-a-half feet tall. Her three grown children tower over her,
just as many young people in this village outside Hanoi dwarf their
parents. The biggest reason the children are so robust: fertilizer.
Nha, her face weathered beyond its 51 years, said her growth was
stunted by a childhood of hunger and malnutrition. Just a few decades
ago, crop yields here were far lower and diets much worse.
Then the widespread use of inexpensive chemical fertilizer, coupled
with market reforms, helped power an agricultural explosion that had
already occurred in other parts of the world. Yields of rice and corn
rose, and diets grew richer. Now those gains are threatened in many
countries by spot shortages and soaring prices for fertilizer, the most
essential ingredient of modern agriculture.
Prices of some fertilizer have nearly tripled in the last year, keeping
farmers from buying all they need. That is one of many factors which
has contributed to the rise in food prices that, according to the UN
World Food Programme, threatens to push tens of millions of poor into
malnutrition.
Protests over high food prices have erupted across the developing
world, and the stability of governments from Senegal to the Philippines
is threatened.
In the US, farmers in Iowa, desperate to replenish nutrients in the
soil, have increased the age-old practice of spreading tonnes of hog
manure on their fields. In India, the cost of subsidizing fertilizer
for farmers has soared, sparking calls for policy reform.
The squeeze on the supply of fertilizer has been building for roughly
five years. Rising demand for food and biofuels prompted farmers
everywhere to plant more crops. As demand grew, the fertilizer mines
and factories proved unable to keep up.
“If you want 10,000 tonnes, they’ll sell you 5,000 today, maybe 3,000,”
said W. Scott Tinsman Jr, a fertilizer manufacturer and dealer in
Davenport, Iowa. “The rubber band is stretched really far.”
Fertilizer companies are confident the shortage will be solved
eventually, noting that they plan to build scores of new factories in
the next few years, many in West Asia where natural gas is abundant.
But that will probably create fresh problems in the long run as the
world grows more dependent on fossil fuels to produce chemical
fertilizers. Intensified use of chemical fertilizers is certain to mean
greater pollution of waterways, too.
Agriculture and development experts say the world has few alternatives
to its growing dependence on fertilizer. Some experts calculate that
synthetic fertilizers made with natural gas have led to greater crop
yields. In sub-Saharan Africa, where hunger and starvation have long
been a threat, a lack of fertilizer is a primary reason yields lag
behind the rest of the world. Efforts to get fertilizer into the hands
of African farmers have been complicated by the recent price increases.
“It’s a very
basic and direct arithmetic point that putting fertilizer on the ground
on a 1-acre plot can, in typical cases, raise an extra tonne of
output,” said Jeffrey D. Sachs, the Col-umbia University economist who
has focused on eradicating poverty. “That’s the difference between life
and death.” The demand for fertilizer has been driven by a confluence
of events, including population growth, shrinking world grain stocks
and the appetite for corn and palm oil used to make biofuel. But
experts say the biggest factor has been the growing demand for food,
especially meat, in the developing world.
Recently, Nha, the
tiny Vietnamese woman, stood in a field outside her village, her
weather-beaten face shielded from the drizzle by a big straw hat. She
took a break from wielding her wood-handled hoe and described the
meager diets of her youth.
Her family, including six brothers
and sisters, struggled to survive on rations from the commune where
they lived, eating little protein. The occasional pigs they raised on
rice stalks and mush “fattened very slowly”, Nha recalled.
But
market reforms in Vietnam during the last two decades gave farmers
access to fertilizer and higher-yielding seeds. Rice yields for each
acre have doubled and corn yields have tripled.
Several times
a season, Nha and her neighbours walk down their rows of corn with
battered metal buckets full of chemical fertilizer, which looks like
coarse grey sand. They sprinkle a bit at the base of each plant and
carefully hoe it in. Nha’s husband, Le Van Son, remembers villagers’
amazement in the 1990s when they learnt that a pound (0.45kg) of
chemical fertilizer contained more of the major nutrients than 100
pounds of manure.
Overall global consumption of fertilizer
increased by an estimated 31% from 1996 to 2008, driven by a 56%
increase in developing countries, according to the International
Fertilizer Industry Association.
“Markets are asking farmers
to step on the accelerator,” said Michael R. Rahm, vice-president for
market analysis and strategic planning at Mosaic, a major fertilizer
producer based in Plymouth, Minnesota. “They’ve pressed on it, but the
market has told them to step on it harder.”
Fertilizer is
basically a combination of nutrients added to soil to help plants grow.
The three most important are nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium. The
latter two have been available for centuries, and today originate from
mines. But nitrogen in a form that plants could absorb was scarce, and
the lack of nitrogen led to low crop yields for centuries.
That
limitation ended in the early 20th century with the invention of a
procedure, now primarily fuelled by natural gas, that draws chemically
inert nitrogen from the air and converts it into a usable form.
As
the use of chemical nitrogen fertilizer spread, it was accompanied by
improved plant varieties and greater mechanization. From 1900 to 2000,
worldwide food production jumped by 600%. Scientists said that increase
was the fundamental reason world population was able to rise to around
6.7 billion today, from 1.7 billion in 1900.
Vaclav Smil, a
professor at the University of Manitoba, calculates that without
nitrogen fertilizer, there would be insufficient food for 40% of the
world’s population, at least based on today’s diets. Other experts have
come up with slightly lower numbers.
New Delhi: India’s ruling coalition on 19August closed ranks
behind Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, whose government risks losing the
critical support of communist allies because of a landmark nuclear deal
with the United States.
The communists, who are not part of
the coalition but shore it up, warned the government of “serious
consequences” if it pursues the US deal.
The United
Progressive Alliance (UPA), the coalition headed by Singh’s Congress
party, said it had “full faith and confidence” in the UPA leadership
and Singh.
After a meeting at the prime minister’s residence,
the UPA said the alliance was confident its leadership would “be able
to address all legitimate concerns, including those voiced by our left
colleagues on issues of national interest”.
The four
communist parties have 60 MPs in the 545-member lower house of
parliament. Singh’s government could fall or be reduced to a minority
if the left withdraws support.