It was not on the
front page but the Orissa violence was reported by much of the world’s
press. “Indian homes torched in Christian-Hindu violence”, said the
International Herald Tribune. “Thousands homeless after Hindu-Christian
violence in India,” reported another.
International reaction was emphatic. Pope Benedict XVI condemned it.
Italy summoned Indian ambassador Arif Shahid Khan and the Italian
cabinet warned it would ask current European Union president, France,
to take up the issue of attacks against Christians. The French
officially told STOI they are deeply concerned and everything must be
done to restore a peaceful dialogue between the communities because
‘‘no person should be in a position of threat because of his or her
religious convictions.’’ The Germans and Americans respond in similar
vein.
But in a sign that some foreign governments recognize the extreme
sensitivity of recurring bouts of violence against Christians in India,
Australia refuses officially to react. It is a delicate issue for them.
One of their citizens, missionary Graham Staines, was burnt alive along
with his two little sons at Orissa’s Manoharpur village in 1999. His
widow, Gladys, has long since returned home. But Bruce Loudon, who
covers India for The Australian, says this diplomatic silence need not
necessarily be seen as negative. Most Australian newspapers were more
concerned about the Bihar floods and Orissa got little space, he
explains. But he adds, ‘‘Incidents like these do tarnish India’s image
as a secular, tolerant country.’’
Unsurprisingly, it is the British who express the most sympathetic
understanding of India’s ground realities. Dan Chugg, spokesman for the
British High Commission in Delhi, says, ‘‘India is viewed as a diverse
place and the country has made a success of diversity.’’ He insists
that “a few incidents cannot mar the image of the country” and it is
not hard to understand that a country as big as India is bound to have
tensions between states and ethnic groups sometimes.
Pushpesh Pant, professor of international relations at JNU, agrees that
‘‘India’s image does not suffer just because a few Christians are
targeted somewhere”. Instead, says Pant, India is viewed negatively by
others “because people here die of starvation even today, and Dalits
have still to fight for their rights.’’ Orissa is not unique to India,
he argues, and violence against minority groups happens elsewhere in
the world as well.
(sujata.sachdeva@timesgroup.com)
http://www1.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Opinion/Sunday_Specials/Special_Report/World_view_Not_
black__white/articleshow/3453391.cms
Copyright © 2008 Bennett Coleman &
Co. Ltd.