The
definition of a drop-out is any child that does not attend school
continuously for 60 days.
It is school time again. But Manikanta, an impish 10-year-old truant
from school in Shanthinagar, has yet again successfully dodged the
education department’s (ED) efforts to enroll him in the Chinnara
Angala bridge course for drop-outs during the summer vacation. What has
been the response of the ED to Manikanta’s battle of wits with it?
Helplessness.
Anjula, 11 years, has also escaped the Chinnara Angala net as she is an
ersatz mother to her three younger siblings, while her mother goes to
work. What has been the ED’s response to the multiple handicaps
preventing Anjula from attending school? Nonchalance.
Sumangala, a 13-year-old, is being sent to work as a domestic maid by
her father Somanna (name changed) since he does not believe in
educating girls. Teachers lament, “What can we do? The family depends
on her earnings, so how can we ask them not to send her to work?”
ED officials have all been notified as inspectors under the Child
Labour Act. What has been the ED’s response to Sumangala working in an
occupation (domestic work) banned as ‘hazardous’ under the Act?
Inaction.
The ED does not implement its own Education Act, which says that any
employer employing children during school working hours should be
penalised. The ED doesn’t seem to be aware of the Children’s Helpline
run by the police to rescue child labourers like Sumangala. The ED
appears to be ignorant of the Juvenile Justice Act, implemented by the
Women and Child Department, under which Child Welfare Committees (CWC)
have been set up to enquire into violations of child rights, including
child labour. A CWC could counsel parents of Manikanta, Anjula and
Sumangala or send the children to a free government hostel, where they
would also receive education. Or the CWCs could require the social
welfare or any other department to provide any necessary assistance to
the families or the communities of these children.
The ED appears to be unaware of the state’s Action Plan on Child
Labour. Under this plan, rather than plead helplessness, the ED could
itself have filed a case or asked the labour department to prosecute
Sumangala’s employers and recovered a penalty of Rs 20,000 from them,
to be used for her education. What’s more, this would be much more than
what she would ever earn by working throughout her childhood.
The ED does none of the above. It has not devised a protocol — which
tells its officials exactly what to do, apart from persuasion, to bring
out-of-school children to school. It merely puts the onus to do this on
hapless teachers like Anitha who have nothing more to work with than
their own compassion and empathy for the children.
Equally bad is the fact that teachers are given this task, when their
task is only to teach. The definition of the education department for a
drop-out is “any child that does not attend school continuously for 60
days”. Does that mean the department need not do anything about an
absentee child for 60 days or until the next Chinnara Angala?
Compare this with the rules of a school in a country we all love to ape
in so many other ways: illegal absences of children beyond the first
three days “are subject to referral to a magistrate for action” and
also shall be referred “to the district attendance officer for
investigation and on-going follow-up”. What is clear is that there is a
definite procedure which however does not involve teachers!
The absence of a specified procedure is the reason why almost 50 per
cent of children fail to complete eight years of compulsory education.
A World Bank study states that no child from the lowest population
quintile ever reaches the tertiary level of education! And yet, we
worry more about tertiary education to a few from the creamy layers.
While we provide huge subsidies from tax-payers’ money to them, we are
unwilling to provide meaningful amounts as scholarships/conditional
cash transfers for compulsory school attendance to the Anjulas and
Sumangalas at the elementary level. So much for the state’s duty to
ensure the Fundamental Right of elementary education of children
between 6-14 years!
http://www.deccanherald.com/Content/Jun32008/panorama2008060271336.asp