Jerry Talbot, Special Representative
for the tsunami operation of the International Federation of Red Cross
and Red Crescent Societies.
ami operation of the International Federation of Red Cross and Red
Crescent Societies.
"I was only thinking of how to get to the hills that time," remembered
Leni, a young mother of a three year old daughter. "I kept remembering
the Aceh tsunami while we were running away. The Aceh tsunami taught us
a lot. It raised our awareness on earthquakes and tsunamis." On the
night of 13 September 2007, when an earthquake off the coast of Sumatra
triggered tsunami warnings around the Indian Ocean, people knew what to
do.
Like Leni in Indonesia, people living in coastal areas in Bangladesh,
India, Sri Lanka and the Maldives knew that they needed to get away
from the water and find higher ground or shelter. Evacuation drills –
some admittedly slicker than others – swung into action.
Hours passed and the threat abated. In the end, it turned out to be a
false alarm, but at least people had been prepared. I had just left the
Maldives at the time, having spent two years there as the head of the
Red Cross Red Crescent tsunami recovery operation. As I read reports of
the response and talked to colleagues in Male', my thoughts inevitably
returned to the devastating 2004 tsunami. How many lives would have
been saved if early warning systems and evacuation drills had been in
place then?
Last month, and Cyclone Sidr smashes into the exposed, low-lying coast
of Bangladesh. As the storm tore its way up the Bay of Bengal, the same
early warning network that was called upon in September saw millions of
people evacuated from its path. In 1991, a storm of a similar magnitude
hit Bangladesh and claimed more than 100,000 lives. This time, because
people were warned and because they knew where to go and what to do,
the toll was limited to about 3,000 tragic losses.
There's no doubt that early warning and systematic evacuation
procedures would have saved many, many thousands of people in December
2004. Lives would still have been lost, but the figure should never
have been as catastrophically high as it was. Early warning and
disaster preparedness save lives.
But this is not the sum of the issue.
Even if the only half as many lives were lost to the tsunami, a whole
generation of people living around the Bay of Bengal would have still
faced a long and difficult recovery. Early warning saves lives, but it
does not always protect assets, livelihoods or economies.
The approach that must be adopted by governments and the humanitarian
sector has to go beyond ensuring immediate safety. This approach has to
be premised on the notion that a hazard does not need to turn into a
disaster. This concept, known within the humanitarian world as disaster
risk reduction, extends beyond evacuation plans and disaster drills to
reducing people's vulnerability and exposure to hazards. It is about
building safer and more resilient communities. At the local level
measures such as community based risk assessment, retrofitting
buildings, non-formal education and supporting livelihoods make a real
difference to people's vulnerability.
This risk reduction approach has been at the heart of the Red Cross Red
Crescent tsunami recovery operation. In his role as the UN's special
envoy for tsunami recovery, former US president Bill Clinton urged
humanitarian agencies to 'build back better'. For us, this means
building back communities that are stronger and more secure against
future threats.
More than 95 per cent of the more than 8,500 houses that we have built
so far in Aceh and the Maldives, for example, meet or exceed local
hazard resistant standards. A huge amount of work has also been done in
trying to impart a culture of risk awareness in communities, as well as
helping develop knowledge on what can be done to mitigate their
impacts. Communities themselves typically know where their
vulnerabilities lie. They know, for example, which hillsides are prone
to sliding in heavy rains, and which rivers are bound to swell.
In January 2005, just weeks after the tsunami, governments adopted the
Hyogo Framework for Action, an international agreement on risk
reduction that requires them to make their own communities safer as
well as to increase their investment in global risk reduction efforts.
But this good will has yet to translate into concrete action.
Investment in disaster risk reduction remains worryingly low. Last
year, President Clinton estimated that only four per cent of global
humanitarian funding went on disaster risk reduction. This has to be
dramatically increased. A figure of 10 per cent has to be the goal.
The time to act is now. It's very clear that climate change is already
contributing to an increase in the frequency and intensity of
meteorological disasters such as storms, floods and droughts. A report
by the UN released earlier this month estimates that, partly because of
climate change, the cost of responding to weather related disasters
will rise dramatically in the coming years to about US$2 billion in
2015.
In September, when the earth shook, Leni knew that she had to take her
small child and flee. This is just the first step. The challenge for us
as an international community is to ensure that there is always
somewhere to run, and that when threats recede, that there is somewhere
to go back to.
A version of this article was published in The Independent (UK) on
Monday 24 December, 2007
http://www.reliefweb.int/rw/RWB.NSF/db900SID/AMMF-7B4JBZ?OpenDocument&rc=3&emid=TS-2004-000147-LKA
© 2008 ReliefWeb