Only Bihar experienced
floods this year. Other places suffered water logging. The statement on
the recent deluge in large parts of the country might have been
dismissed as ludicrous verbiage, had it not been that of the Indian
Meteorological Department’s spokesperson. Ludicrous it still is. But
dismiss it, we cannot. For conventional thinking has it that floods are
caused by excessive rainfall. The IMD spokesperson was only going by
what has become a truism for many in the country’s scientific
establishment.
But weather has a way of making shibboleths appear what they are.
That’s exactly what happened this year. Except Bihar, none of the
flood-hit states experienced more than normal rainfall. So the IMD is
correct, in a way—except that we are talking about a reality about
which it has little clue. Issues like reservoir overfilling and melting
glaciers have made floods much more complex than what they have been so
far deemed to be. But sadly, our science and engineering organisations
like IMD and Central Water Commission seem to be too scared to share
crucial data even among themselves.
Even more worrying is the ante-diluvian methods of these research
organisations. They have stuck to old methods of research with an
obduracy that does not bode well in times of far-reaching changes in
climate. Research, for example, has shown that extreme rainfall events
are on the rise, while the average rainfall has remained more or less
constant in parts of the country.IMD with its reliance on long-term
averages is inept at analysing such weather quirks. Moreover we now
have evidence that there is considerable irregularity in water flow due
to glacial melt. But the quantity or rate of increase of flow—or the
time since when this has been occurring—has not been measured as yet.
The government’s response was also on fixed lines. Herd people into
relief camps, air drop food and provisions. Don’t make any mistake.
Relief and rehabilitation is necessary. But it’s their knee-jerk
character that’s in question. If floods are an almost annual occurrence
why don’t we have an effective mechanism to predict them? After every
major flood—or any other natural calamity—committees are constituted
and reports are submitted only to gather dust on the tables of
government officials. Cynics might say that this will happen again
after this year’s floods. Let’s hope they are wrong—at least this time.
http://www.downtoearth.org.in/full6.asp?foldername=20070915&filename=led&sec_id=3&sid=1
Copyright ©2004 Society for
Environmental Communications