CED a progressive Information Centre
centre for education & documentation-critical concerns:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
A monthly Review of clippings on Critical Issues & Concerns for NGOs, Activists
and others concerned with Justice & Social Change

--------------------------------------------------------------------
July 2008

A Plan without a Vision

The long-awaited National Action Plan on Climate Change (NAPCC) is an important mark in the climate change debate in India. It is not, however, an adequate response to the scale of the challenge.

India has faced considerable, and largely unfair, pressure from the industrialised world to take action for a problem substantially created by them. At the same time, India has much to lose from a changing climate, and much to gain for climate and non-climate reasons from enhancing the ecological sustainability of our development path.

The NAPCC starts with an important commitment to re-direct growth objectives toward ecological sustainability,  but provides  a mixed  bag of measures through which to do so. As a result, the NAPCC document is neither  fully vision nor plan. And it fails  to grapple squarely with the international deadlock  in the  climate arena. Despite these drawbacks, simply having such a plan is significant for  climate  related debates in India.

On the other, the G8 summit in Japan was also expected to address the issue of climate change and come up with a vision statement as how it is to be achieved.

But what emerged  from the summit leads to the conclusion that the rate of progress on critical issues between successive summits is questionable. The leadership of the richest countries in the world needs to reflect on their responsibility to the global community at large  and the expectations which call for bolder measures and major changes in the interests of protecting  the planet and all species living on it.

If the G8 countries, led by the United States, are indeed serious about mitigating climate change, they must deliver on their promises between now and 2012, when the Kyoto Protocol ends. They need to work with utmost urgency to cut their own emissions from a meaningful baseline.


Climate Change Abstract of below articles >>>